While the comsic ray correlation might be real (I haven't read the paper), I doubt it's mutally exclusive with a carbon dioxide correlation. Most importantly though, I'm having serious trouble corroborating Tim Patterson's belief that global temperature and carbon dioxide levels have not been correlated over the last 135 million years with this data from NOAA:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4f9da/4f9da926f898a7f5c24f057432657faf4ccafd6c" alt=""
For the past 650 thousand years, that seems like a pretty strong correlation to me, but I'm no climatologist. I'd like to see the carbon dioxide data for the same time frame Tim Patterson discusses. I just read the wikipedia article.
Ah, here we go, here's someone who has critiqued the Veizer study far better than I could.
No comments:
Post a Comment